SC clubs ECP’s election case, petitions challenging judgment review law
The Supreme Court (SC) on Wednesday adjourned the hearing of the Punjab election review case and the Supreme Court Review of Judgements and Orders Act 2023 — which mandates the establishment of a larger bench for reviewing a suo motu judgement — till June 13.
A three-member bench headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial had clubbed the Punjab election review case and the Review Order Act case earlier in the day.
The bench headed by the top judge also includes Justice Ijaz ul Ahsan and Justice Munib Akhtar.
KP, Punjab elections: SC to announce verdict tomorrow after parties wrap up arguments
During the hearing, CJP Bandial remarked that the court will try to make a decision on the Election Commission of Pakistan’s (ECP) plea for reviewing the verdict on the Punjab elections at the earliest.
“We have received some petitions. The matter of the Review Order Act has to be seen at this stage,” CJP Bandial said.
He said that the court would issue notice to the AGP, after which the bench will hear the ECP’s review plea under the Review Order Act.
The CJP then asked PTI lawyer Barrister Ali Zafar to give his views on the Review Order Act.
At this, Barrister Zafar maintained that the SC Review Order Act was against the Constitution.
Bench hearing pleas against leaks commission not appropriate ;statement to SC
“The same matter was raised in the SC Practice and Procedure Act, on which the Supreme Court has given a stay,” the lawyer contended, claiming that the same stay applied to the Review Order Act as well.
He contended that the SC had the authority to hear the ECP’s review plea as the Review Order Act did not yet apply to the court due to the stay.
The court can hold back the decision on the Punjab election review case till the decision on Review Order Act, the barrister said while urging the court to decide on the election case soon.
Govt plan afoot to ban PTI amid crackdown on May 9 rioters, Imran Khan claims
At this, Justice Akhtar remarked that the ECP’s lawyer would have to give arguments before a larger bench if the Review Order Act is enforced.
“How could the court hear the Punjab election case if the SC Review Order Act has been enforced,” he asked.
He also asked the lawyer to tell him how did the Review Order Act not apply to the SC.
Meanwhile, CJP Bandial remarked that everyone wanted a decision on the Punjab election review case.
“There are certain limits for [filing] an appeal,” the top judge remarked, adding that the ECP’s lawyer had contended that they had extensive authorities.
“The matter of elections is a national issue. Implementation on the May 14 orders is not possible but this has become a historical verdict,” he added.
Meanwhile, petitioners Zaman Khan Wardag and Ghulam Mohiuddin adopted the arguments of Barrister Zafar.
Imran moves SC against ;undeclared martial law&;
The court remarked that the petitioners maintained in the pleas that the act was illegal and a constitutional amendment was required to extend the jurisdiction of reviews.
A stay had already been issued on the implementation of the SC Practice and Procedure Act by the larger bench, the court stated while ordering to fix both cases for hearing together on June 13.
CJP Bandial remarked that the SC would conduct hearing on the cases daily after the said date.
The court, while issuing notices to AGP, President Arif Alvi, the federal government, Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs, ordered fixing the hearing of both cases together on June 13.
